Yesterday, it was reported that WWE superstar Jey Uso would no longer be using his new catchphrase ‘Yeet’ due to some unexplained trademark disputes. The former Bloodline member had been using the phrase since his viral post-Fastlane press conference. You can read about that here.
We now have an update on that story. Indie wrestler Kassey Huffman filed to trademark the terms ‘Yeet’ and ‘Yeet Movement’ back in 2021. Both filings were made for pro-wrestling exhibitions and entertainment purposes. However, those applications were suspended in 2022. WWE has never filed to trademark ‘Yeet’ so at this time Jey Uso will not be using the term going forward. There are still ‘Yeet’ shirts being sold on WWE Shop.
The full detailed document regarding the ‘Yeet’ and ‘Yeet Movement’ suspension can be read below.
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: October 08, 2022
INTRODUCTION
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 10/03/2022.
In a previous Office action(s) dated 04/03/2022, applicant was informed of the following issues:
REFUSAL – MATERIAL MISMATCH WITH SPECIMEN
REFUSAL – NONMATERIAL MISMATCH WITH SPECIMEN
REFUSAL – SPECIMEN DOES NOT SHOW USE IN COMMERCE
POTENTIAL REFUSAL – PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION
REQUIREMENT – IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES
Based on applicant’s response dated 10/03/2022, the following issues have been
resolved: REQUIREMENT – IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES. See TMEP
§§713.02, 714.04.
Applicant’s arguments and amendment with respect to refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) have been
considered and found unpersuasive. While applicant has attached a new specimen, the substitute
specimen is a video that indicates the wrestler is Huffmanly. There is no indication that either wrestler
mentioned in the video is ‘Yeet”. The only association of “Yeet” is on the shirt which Huffmanly is
wearing and possibly as a chant. However, this mention is unclear to whether “Yeet” refers to the
applied-for services and not a random slogan that has no meaning to the applied-for services at hand.
As such, the following refusal(s) and requirement(s) are continued and maintained:
REFUSAL – SPECIMEN
•
POTENTIAL REFUSAL – PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION
•
Further, the trademark examining attorney is suspending action on the application for the reason(s)
stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
SUSPENSION OF APPLICATION
The effective filing date of the pending application(s) identified below precedes the filing date of
applicant’s application. If the mark in the referenced application(s) registers, applicant’s mark may be
refused registration under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with that registered
mark(s). See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. Therefore, action on this
application is suspended until the earlier-filed referenced application(s) is either registered or
abandoned.